Misread intentions: Vijay Kumar on pro-caste claims in film

Actor and filmmaker Vijay Kumar’s recent film seems to have attracted a few contentious readings, with some viewers interpreting it as being pro-certain castes. Vijay admits he is perplexed by these responses. “I find it difficult to reconcile those interpretations with my intent,” he says, reiterating that the film was never meant to endorse hierarchy, but to provoke reflection. The central point of the film, he says, was sparked by a moment of introspection. “I had read an article that pointed out how many of India’s top-performing films revolve around extramarital affairs. It made me pause and reflect. I felt an urge to make a film that moved in the opposite direction — one that would compel audiences to reflect on their own behaviour. Landlord emerged from that thought,” he says.Justifying the intent of the film, Vijay explains, “We tend to think of the Constitution as something lofty, meant only for government institutions. But that isn’t true. If you just read it, you’ll realise how much it empowers the average person by making them aware of their rights. That awareness alone can transform society. And what’s wrong if I highlight that?” he questions. “If my films hold up a mirror to society, that’s where my responsibility ends. The onus ultimately lies with the audience. It’s up to them to take a break from endless reels, watch thought-provoking cinema, engage with it, and form their own opinions,” he says.